Skip to main content

Weapons & Rank/ratings

Underrepresented Genders & Women's Steel Sword and Buckler Regional
Current
1285 #49
Peak
1286 April 2026
Record
0W · 0L
Last
April 2026
Underrepresented Genders and Women's Steel Rapier and Dagger
Current
897 #96
Peak
897 April 2026
Record
0W · 2L
Last
April 2026

Scout analysis

Sword & Buckler

4W · 3L (57%)
Form
Building
57% win rate · 7 fights
Record: 4W · 3L (57%)
Trajectory needs 8+ fights - will sharpen as more data lands.
Current streak: 1 Win
Based on 7 recorded sword & buckler fights.
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
Over/under needs 5+ rated fights - calculating as more data lands.
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Fast starter
5 exchange-coded matches
Exchanges per point: 1.41
Avg exchanges / match: 9
Doubles / match: 0
First scorer rate: 80%
Dominant wins (shut-out): 25%
Comeback wins (was behind): 100%
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 75%
Pool stage: 3W · 1L (75%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.

Rapier & Dagger

0W · 2L (0%)
Form
Building
0% win rate · 2 fights
Record: 0W · 2L (0%)
Trajectory needs 8+ fights - will sharpen as more data lands.
Current streak: 2 Losses
Based on 2 recorded rapier & dagger fights.
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
Over/under needs 5+ rated fights - calculating as more data lands.
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate, comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Sample too small
Stage breakdown pending
Pool stage: needs 3+ coded fights.
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Reach
1 event · uk
Single-weapon
Tournaments: 1
Countries fought in: 1 (uk)
Rated weapons: 1

Clubmates · Smart HEMA Clubs (66)

Events & fights (1)

Herne's Cup Open 2026
April 2026 · uk
9 fights
Rating outcome
  • Underrepresented Genders and Women's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 106 · 897.7
  • Underrepresented Genders & Women's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 50 · 1,286.0
LOSS
Raquel Pullicino · Smart HEMA Clubs Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 0-3 Review →
1598
LOSS
Sophia Evans Garcia · The Renaissance Sword Club Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 5-1 Review →
1661
LOSS
Grace DeBanks · Ausardia Sword & Buckler · Bronze Medal Match Score 3-11 Review →
1338
LOSS
Sara Pacitto · Ausardia Sword & Buckler · Pools Score 4-6 Review →
1589
WIN
Ashley Cushman · Oxford Sword and Staff Sword & Buckler · Pools Score 8-0 Review →
747
WIN
Giu Williamson · Academy of Steel Sword & Buckler · Pools Score 8-3 Review →
1040
WIN
Sophia Evans Garcia · The Renaissance Sword Club Sword & Buckler · Pools Score 5-1 Review →
1483
LOSS
Sara Pacitto · Ausardia Sword & Buckler · Semifinals Score 4-6 Review →
1589
WIN
Giu Williamson · Academy of Steel Sword & Buckler · Top 8 Score 8-3 Review →
1040
How to read this profile

Rating is Glicko-2: the number shown is score - 2*RD (97.5% confidence lower bound), not raw skill. Inactive fighters "drift down" as RD grows - not because they got worse.

Hemaratings ratings don't factor in match scores, exchange counts, or doubles. Scout's score-margin and style metrics describe HOW a fighter fights, not the rating tier their results earned.

Hemaratings recomputes in batches days-to-weeks after events. A fighter's most recent tournament may not yet be reflected.

Regional At least one of this fighter's ratings is "island" - their rank/percentile is relative to an isolated regional scene, not the global population. Cross-scene rating comparisons are unreliable.