Kenneth Parker●
Full profile ↗
Society of Historical Fencing●
· United States
updated 5h ago
updating...
Report an issue with this data
Pool rank #7
Wins 3
Points diff
+25
Exchange analytics
Clean hit ratio
71%
field 46%
AB effectiveness
67%
AB defence
67%
field 55%
Pts / match
0.3 / 1
Best win:
Montana Nicholson●
(pool rank #24)
Worst loss:
Mark Heidrick●
(pool rank #26)
✓
Clean hit ratio: 10 landed vs 4 taken (71%) - division avg 46%
✓
Win rate: 3/3 pool matches (100%)
·
Avg 0.3 scored, 1 conceded per match (net -0.7)
✓
4 of 6 afterblow exchanges converted to points (67%)
·
Afterblow defence rate: 67% - division avg 55%
✗
3 double hits from 23 total exchanges (13%)
✓
3 of 4 scoring afterblows landed to deep targets (body/head)
✓
Best win: Montana Nicholson (pool rank #24)
✗
Worst loss: Mark Heidrick (pool rank #26)
Pools
3W-0L
(Pool 1)
Elim
0W-1L
(reached Top 32)
Pool 1
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Elimination
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Post-event review
Style at this event
Matches analysed
Avg doubles/match
Exchanges per point
Scored first
Comeback rate
Shutout wins
No exchange data cached for this fighter at this event. Exchange data is available after matches are scored.
View finals bracket →
Stats describe results, not intent. Some fighters compete to experiment, others to win. Use this as one input, not a script.
Scouting as
Win / Loss
Total
Rated divisions
inactive
No HEMA Ratings profile found. Analysis based on opponent data only.
Opponent breakdown
Club mate
Difficulty
Previous meetings
Win / Loss
Total
No rating in this division
No profile found on HEMA Ratings
At peak rating
Elim specialist
Avg opponent rating:
Pool:
·
Elim:
Expected wins, actual (over rated fights)
Active , avg across
Peak rating gap:
Recent form
Competes in divisions
Club intel
|
|
Want to scout someone else in the same pool?
Scout another fighter →