Yat Chung (MJ) Ma○
updated 11d ago
updating...
Report an issue with this data
Pool rank #7
Wins 3
Points diff
+19
Exchange analytics
Clean hit ratio
53%
field 45%
AB effectiveness
24%
AB defence
86%
field 76%
Pts / match
10 / 5.3
Best win:
Daniel Thomson●
(pool rank #11)
Worst loss:
Patrick Bromfield●
(pool rank #4)
✓
Clean hit ratio: 16 landed vs 14 taken (53%) - division avg 45%
✓
Win rate: 3/4 pool matches (75%)
✓
Avg 10 scored, 5.3 conceded per match (net +4.7)
·
13 of 21 afterblow exchanges negated by equal value (62%)
✓
5 of 21 afterblow exchanges converted to points (24%)
✓
Afterblow defence rate: 86% - division avg 76%
✓
5 of 5 scoring afterblows landed to deep targets (body/head)
✓
Best win: Daniel Thomson (pool rank #11)
✗
Worst loss: Patrick Bromfield (pool rank #4)
Pools
3W-1L
(Pool 2)
Pool 2
7 exch
7 clean
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
4 exch
4 clean
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
4 exch
4 clean
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Post-event review
Style at this event
Matches analysed
Avg doubles/match
Exchanges per point
Scored first
Comeback rate
Shutout wins
No exchange data cached for this fighter at this event. Exchange data is available after matches are scored.
View finals bracket →
Stats describe results, not intent. Some fighters compete to experiment, others to win. Use this as one input, not a script.
Scouting as
Win / Loss
Total
Rated divisions
inactive
No HEMA Ratings profile found. Analysis based on opponent data only.
Opponent breakdown
Club mate
Difficulty
Previous meetings
Win / Loss
Total
No rating in this division
No profile found on HEMA Ratings
At peak rating
Elim specialist
Avg opponent rating:
Pool:
·
Elim:
Expected wins, actual (over rated fights)
Active , avg across
Peak rating gap:
Recent form
Competes in divisions
Club intel
|
|
Want to scout someone else in the same pool?
Scout another fighter →