Jared Blocker●
Full profile ↗
Society of Historical Fencing●
· United States
updated 4d ago
updating...
Report an issue with this data
Pool rank #37
Wins 0
Points diff
+10
Advanced
Exchange analytics
Clean hit ratio
31%
field 48%
AB effectiveness
50%
AB defence
50%
field 58%
Pts / match
1.3 / 6.3
Worst loss:
James Moss●
(pool rank #28)
✗
Clean hit ratio: 5 landed vs 11 taken (31%) - division avg 48%
✗
Win rate: 0/3 pool matches (0%)
·
Avg 1.3 scored, 6.3 conceded per match (net -5)
✗
Afterblow defence rate: 50% - division avg 58%
✗
6 double hits from 28 total exchanges (21%)
✓
2 of 3 scoring afterblows landed to deep targets (body/head)
✗
Worst loss: James Moss (pool rank #28)
Pools
0W-2L
(Pool 3, advanced)
Elim
0W-1L
(reached Top 40)
Pool 3
6 exch
2 clean
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
9 exch
6 clean 1 AB 1 no-exchange
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
8 exch
6 clean 1 AB 1 no-exchange
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Elimination
8 exch
2 clean 4 AB
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Post-event review
Style at this event
Matches analysed
Avg doubles/match
Exchanges per point
Scored first
Comeback rate
Shutout wins
No exchange data cached for this fighter at this event. Exchange data is available after matches are scored.
View finals bracket →
Stats describe results, not intent. Some fighters compete to experiment, others to win. Use this as one input, not a script.
Scouting as
Win / Loss
Total
Rated divisions
inactive
No HEMA Ratings profile found. Analysis based on opponent data only.
Opponent breakdown
Club mate
Difficulty
Previous meetings
Win / Loss
Total
No rating in this division
No profile found on HEMA Ratings
At peak rating
Elim specialist
Avg opponent rating:
Pool:
·
Elim:
Expected wins, actual (over rated fights)
Active , avg across
Peak rating gap:
Recent form
Competes in divisions
Club intel
|
|
Want to scout someone else in the same pool?
Scout another fighter →