Dickens, John○
Lexington○
updated 62d ago
updating...
Report an issue with this data
Finished 21st (tied)
Pool rank #30
Wins 10
Exchange analytics
Clean hit ratio
39%
field 49%
AB effectiveness
0%
AB defence
100%
field 100%
Pts / match
0 / -2
Best win:
McConnell, Mary○
(pool rank #28)
Worst loss:
Pharis, Dave○
(pool rank #17)
·
Clean hit ratio: 11 landed vs 17 taken (39%) - division avg 49%
·
Win rate: 2/5 pool matches (40%)
✓
Avg 0 scored, -2 conceded per match (net +2)
✓
Best win: McConnell, Mary (pool rank #28)
✗
Worst loss: Pharis, Dave (pool rank #17)
Pools
2W-3L
(Pool 2)
Pool 2
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
3 exch
3 clean
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB hit clean Double no exchange Warning - | hit AB clean no exchange Warning - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Post-event review
Style at this event
Matches analysed
Avg doubles/match
Exchanges per point
Scored first
Comeback rate
Shutout wins
No exchange data cached for this fighter at this event. Exchange data is available after matches are scored.
View finals bracket →
Stats describe results, not intent. Some fighters compete to experiment, others to win. Use this as one input, not a script.
Scouting as
Win / Loss
Total
Rated divisions
inactive
No HEMA Ratings profile found. Analysis based on opponent data only.
Opponent breakdown
Club mate
Difficulty
Previous meetings
Win / Loss
Total
No rating in this division
No profile found on HEMA Ratings
At peak rating
Elim specialist
Avg opponent rating:
Pool:
·
Elim:
Expected wins, actual (over rated fights)
Active , avg across
Peak rating gap:
Recent form
Competes in divisions
Club intel
|
|
Want to scout someone else in the same pool?
Scout another fighter →