Chloe Hargroves●
Full profile ↗
Academy of Historical Fencing●
· United Kingdom
updated 20d ago
updating...
Report an issue with this data
Pool rank #8
Wins 2
Points diff
-6
Advanced
Exchange analytics
Clean hit ratio
39%
field 48%
AB effectiveness
33%
AB defence
70%
field 77%
Pts / match
7.3 / 8.8
Best win:
Kerri Tamplin●
(pool rank #6)
Worst loss:
Grace DeBanks●
(pool rank #5)
·
Clean hit ratio: 11 landed vs 17 taken (39%) - division avg 48%
·
Win rate: 2/4 pool matches (50%)
·
Avg 7.3 scored, 8.8 conceded per match (net -1.5)
·
11 of 30 afterblow exchanges negated by equal value (37%)
✓
10 of 30 afterblow exchanges converted to points (33%)
·
Afterblow defence rate: 70% - division avg 77%
✗
14 of 31 hits taken were to deep targets (45%) - body/head
✓
10 of 10 scoring afterblows landed to deep targets (body/head)
✓
Best win: Kerri Tamplin (pool rank #6)
✗
Worst loss: Grace DeBanks (pool rank #5)
Pools
2W-2L
(Pool 1, advanced)
Matches
16 exch
7 clean 9 AB
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hit AB clean Double no exchange - | hit AB clean no exchange - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hit AB clean Double no exchange - | hit AB clean no exchange - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hit AB clean Double no exchange - | hit AB clean no exchange - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Loading exchanges...
First blood:
swipe →
| # | Time | Net | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hit AB clean Double no exchange - | hit AB clean no exchange - | - |
No exchange data cached for this match yet.
Post-event review
Style at this event
Matches analysed
Avg doubles/match
Exchanges per point
Scored first
Comeback rate
Shutout wins
No exchange data cached for this fighter at this event. Exchange data is available after matches are scored.
View finals bracket →
Stats describe results, not intent. Some fighters compete to experiment, others to win. Use this as one input, not a script.
Scouting as
Win / Loss
Total
Rated divisions
inactive
No HEMA Ratings profile found. Analysis based on opponent data only.
Opponent breakdown
Club mate
Difficulty
Previous meetings
Win / Loss
Total
No rating in this division
No profile found on HEMA Ratings
At peak rating
Elim specialist
Avg opponent rating:
Pool:
·
Elim:
Expected wins, actual (over rated fights)
Active , avg across
Peak rating gap:
Recent form
Competes in divisions
Club intel
|
|
Want to scout someone else in the same pool?
Scout another fighter →
Fetching match data