Checking for newer data...
Newer data is available for this fighter.
Justin Gonzales
Weapons & Rank/ratings
Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword
Current
1222
#2,917
Peak
1226
May 2026
Record
17W · 26L · 1126D
Last
May 2026
Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier
Current
1094
#1,213
Peak
1108
May 2025
Record
6W · 14L
Last
May 2025
Mixed & Men's Steel Sabre
Current
1137
#1,660
Peak
1146
April 2025
Record
2W · 2L · 1D
Last
April 2025
Mixed & Men's Singlestick
Regional
Current
969
#369
Peak
977
April 2025
Record
1W · 2L · 1D
Last
April 2025
Scout analysis
Longsword
17W · 26L · 2D (38%)
Longsword
17W · 26L · 2D (38%)
Form
Steady
Recent 41% vs older 36%
▾
Form
Steady
Recent 41% vs older 36%
Record: 17W · 26L · 2D (38%)
Recent half (22 fights): 41%
Older half (22 fights): 36%
Delta: +5%
Current streak: 1 Win
Based on 45 recorded longsword fights.
Schedule
Punching up
-1.2 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Punching up
-1.2 vs expectation
Quality wins (won as clear underdog): 4
Upset losses (lost as clear favourite): 2
Over/under vs expectation:
-1.2
(10 actual / 11.2 expected, n=27)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
▾
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's
exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate,
comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 35%
▾
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 35%
Pool stage: 8W · 15L (35%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
At peak
Near career best
▾
Peak
At peak
Near career best
Current rating: 1222
Peak rating: 1226 (May 2026)
Gap to peak: -3
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
By division
Mixed Steel Longsword With Optional Dagger (Advanced)
9W · 9L
(50%)
+2 vs expectation
(n=13)
avg opponent 1222
Mixed Steel Longsword (Tier B)
4W · 5L · 1D
(40%)
avg opponent 1231
Mixed Steel Longsword (Open)
2W · 7L
(22%)
-1.6 vs expectation
(n=8)
avg opponent 1183
Mixed Steel Longsword
2W · 5L · 1D
(25%)
-1.6 vs expectation
(n=6)
avg opponent 1326
Rapier
6W · 14L (30%)
Rapier
6W · 14L (30%)
Form
Rising
Recent 50% vs older 10%
▾
Form
Rising
Recent 50% vs older 10%
Record: 6W · 14L (30%)
Recent half (10 fights): 50%
Older half (10 fights): 10%
Delta: +40%
Current streak: 2 Losses
Based on 20 recorded rapier fights.
Schedule
Punching up
-0.6 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Punching up
-0.6 vs expectation
Quality wins (won as clear underdog): 1
Upset losses (lost as clear favourite): 1
Over/under vs expectation:
-0.6
(2 actual / 2.6 expected, n=7)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Fast starter
7 exchange-coded matches
▾
Style
Fast starter
7 exchange-coded matches
Exchanges per point: 1.78
Avg exchanges / match: 6.9
Doubles / match: 0.86
First scorer rate: 86%
Dominant wins (shut-out): 0%
Comeback wins (was behind): 100%
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 33%
▾
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 33%
Pool stage: 6W · 12L (33%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
At peak
Near career best
▾
Peak
At peak
Near career best
Current rating: 1094
Peak rating: 1108 (May 2025)
Gap to peak: -13
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Sabre
2W · 2L · 1D (40%)
Sabre
2W · 2L · 1D (40%)
Form
Building
40% win rate · 5 fights
▾
Form
Building
40% win rate · 5 fights
Record: 2W · 2L · 1D (40%)
Trajectory needs 8+ fights - will sharpen as more data lands.
Current streak: 2 Wins
Based on 5 recorded sabre fights.
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
▾
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
Over/under needs 5+ rated fights - calculating as more data lands.
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Measured
4 exchange-coded matches
▾
Style
Measured
4 exchange-coded matches
Exchanges per point: 3.44
Avg exchanges / match: 7.8
Doubles / match: 0.75
First scorer rate: 50%
Dominant wins (shut-out): 0%
Comeback wins (was behind): 100%
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 50%
▾
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 50%
Pool stage: 2W · 2L (50%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
At peak
Near career best
▾
Peak
At peak
Near career best
Current rating: 1137
Peak rating: 1146 (April 2025)
Gap to peak: -9
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Singlestick
1W · 2L · 1D (25%)
Singlestick
1W · 2L · 1D (25%)
Form
Building
25% win rate · 4 fights
▾
Form
Building
25% win rate · 4 fights
Record: 1W · 2L · 1D (25%)
Trajectory needs 8+ fights - will sharpen as more data lands.
Current streak: 2 Losses
Based on 4 recorded singlestick fights.
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
▾
Schedule
Schedule forming
Expectation data pending
Over/under needs 5+ rated fights - calculating as more data lands.
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
▾
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's
exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate,
comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 33%
▾
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 33%
Pool stage: 1W · 2L (33%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
At peak
Near career best
▾
Peak
At peak
Near career best
Current rating: 969
Peak rating: 977 (April 2025)
Gap to peak: -7
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Reach
5 events · us · 1.9 yrs active
4 rated weapons
▾
Reach
5 events · us · 1.9 yrs active
4 rated weapons
Tournaments: 5
Countries fought in: 1 (us)
Months active: 23
Fights / year: 38.6
Rated weapons: 4
Clubmates
·
New Haven Historical Fencing●
(18)
Events & fights
(5)
18 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 2383 ▲1445 · 1,263.8
21 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 3174 ▼390 · 1,133.2
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 954 ▲356 · 1,108.2
Legend of the Lake 2025●
April 2025 · us
14 fights
▾
April 2025 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 2784 ▼50 · 1,163.6
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sabre Rank 1084 · 1,146.7
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 1310 ▼164 · 906.5
- Mixed & Men's Singlestick Rank 334 · 977.1
WIN
Adrian Statkevicus●
·
University of Vermont Historical Fencing Club●
Sabre
· Pools
Score 5-2
Review →
LOSS
1569 26%
DRAW
Em Phillips●
·
University of Vermont Historical Fencing Club●
Singlestick
· Pools
Score 2-2
Review →
739
FrogFecht 2025●
March 2025 · us
11 fights
▾
March 2025 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 2734 ▼218 · 1,163.0
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 1146 · 977.4
WIN
954 61%
WIN
Leona Ninteau●
·
Per La Vita Academy of Western Martial Arts●
Rapier
· Pools
Score 11-9 · 1 double
Review →
10 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 2114 · 1,176.9
How to read this profile
Rating is Glicko-2: the number shown is score - 2*RD (97.5% confidence lower bound), not raw skill. Inactive fighters "drift down" as RD grows - not because they got worse.
Hemaratings ratings don't factor in match scores, exchange counts, or doubles. Scout's score-margin and style metrics describe HOW a fighter fights, not the rating tier their results earned.
Hemaratings recomputes in batches days-to-weeks after events. A fighter's most recent tournament may not yet be reflected.
Regional At least one of this fighter's ratings is "island" - their rank/percentile is relative to an isolated regional scene, not the global population. Cross-scene rating comparisons are unreliable.