Skip to main content

Will Espeseth

Rating
1187
Rank
#3,100 (top 41%)
Record
3W · 13L (16 fights)
Inactive 12m

Weapons

Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword
Current
1187 #3,100
Peak
1196 July 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
July 2025
Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier
Current
1066 #1,234
Peak
1070 November 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
November 2025
Mixed & Men's Steel Sabre
Current
1041 #1,993
Peak
1050 July 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
July 2025
Mixed & Men's Singlestick Regional
Current
978 #379
Peak
988 February 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
February 2025
Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger
Current
923 #1,176
Peak
928 November 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
November 2025

Scout analysis

Form
Rising
Recent 50% vs older 33%
Record: 5W · 8L (38%)
Recent half (6 fights): 50%
Older half (6 fights): 33%
Delta: +17%
Current streak: 1 Loss
Based on 13 recorded longsword fights.
Schedule
Punching up
Avg opponent 1382
Avg opponent rating: 1382
Avg rating of fighters beaten: 1178
Avg rating of fighters who beat them: 1470
Quality wins (vs higher-rated): 1
Upset losses (to lower-rated by 50+): 1
Over/under needs 5+ rated fights - calculating as more data lands.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate, comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 40%
Pool stage: 4W · 6L (40%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Reach
2 events · us · 9 mo active
5 rated weapons
Tournaments: 2
Countries fought in: 1 (us)
Months active: 9
Fights / year: 17.3
Rated weapons: 5
Peak
At peak
Near career best
Current rating: 1187
Peak rating: 1196 (July 2025)
Gap to peak: -8
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.

Events & fights (4)

14 fights
Rating outcome
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 3072 · 1,067.9
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 797 · 861.4
WIN
Zachary Boyd · Second Intent Fencing Longsword · Elimination Bracket
1127
LOSS
Benjamin Aycrigg · Atlanta Historical Fencing Academy Longsword · Elimination Bracket
1901
WIN
Michele Gulley · HEMA Lexington Longsword · Pool Set 1
1221
LOSS
1721
LOSS
Joel Conley · St. Louis HEMA Association Longsword · Pool Set 1
1026
LOSS
1361
LOSS
LOSS
Julian Maddox · Swordwind Historical Swordsmanship Rapier & Dagger · Elimination Bracket
WIN
John Tease Rapier & Dagger · Pool Set 1
LOSS
Richard Escoto · Atlanta Historical Fencing Academy Rapier & Dagger · Pool Set 1
1124
LOSS
1230
LOSS
Jayce Williamsonon · Knoxville Academy of the Blade Rapier & Dagger · Pool Set 1
862
LOSS
Zachary Boyd · Second Intent Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pool Set 1
1252
LOSS
Tom Leslie · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pool Set 1
1592
16 fights
Rating outcome
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 1010 ▲66 · 928.7
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 1178 · 1,070.9
LOSS
Gabriel Luis · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Consolation Bracket Score 5-7 Review →
LOSS
Tom Leslie · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 3-7 · 2 doubles Review →
1603 12%
LOSS
Daniel Kumatz · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 1-7 · 1 double Review →
830 47%
LOSS
Brandon Ransbury · Two Ravens Fencing School Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 2-7 · 1 double Review →
1389 21%
LOSS
Steven Jennett · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 4-7 · 3 doubles Review →
LOSS
Gerard Averill · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 4-7 · 2 doubles Review →
1426 19%
WIN
Lucas Lacher · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Pools Score 7-4 · 1 double Review →
WIN
Steven Jennett · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier & Dagger · Top 12 Score 4-7 · 3 doubles Review →
LOSS
1484 17%
LOSS
Tom Leslie · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier · Consolation Bracket Score 3-7 · 2 doubles Review →
1351
DRAW
Tom Leslie · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier · Pools Score 3-7 · 2 doubles Review →
1351
WIN
Christopher Pavon · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier · Pools Score 7-6 · 4 doubles Review →
1257
LOSS
Chris Holloman · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Rapier · Pools Score 5-7 · 3 doubles Review →
1390
LOSS
LOSS
LOSS
12 fights
Rating outcome
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Longsword Rank 2702 ▲1165 · 1,196.5
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Sabre Rank 1576 ▲192 · 1,050.1
WIN
Michele Gulley · HEMA Lexington Longsword · Pools Score 7-4 Review →
1184 50%
LOSS
1360 33%
LOSS
Caleb Bonsack · Indianapolis Fencing Club Longsword · Pools Score 3-7 Review →
1533 25%
WIN
WIN
LOSS
1385 33%
LOSS
1017 47%
LOSS
Justin Hernandez · Vanguard Fencing Club Sabre · Pools Score 1-7 Review →
1428 29%
LOSS
William Crockett · Cookeville HEMA Club Sabre · Pools Score 3-7 Review →
1512 21%
WIN
850 63%
15 fights
Rating outcome
  • Mixed & Men's Steel Sabre Rank 1535 · 985.5
  • Mixed & Men's Singlestick Rank 311 · 988.2
LOSS
Philip Gentry · Cookeville HEMA Club Sabre · Consolation Bracket
LOSS
1573
WIN
Brandon Brewington · Cookeville HEMA Club Sabre · Elimination Bracket
LOSS
1044
WIN
LOSS
William Crockett · Cookeville HEMA Club Singlestick · Eighth-Finals
WIN
Nathan Beard · Nashville School of Historical Fencing Singlestick · Elimination Bracket
WIN
LOSS
LOSS
LOSS

Clubmates · Nashville School of Historical Fencing (42)

How to read this profile

Rating is Glicko-2: the number shown is score - 2*RD (97.5% confidence lower bound), not raw skill. Inactive fighters "drift down" as RD grows - not because they got worse.

Hemaratings ratings don't factor in match scores, exchange counts, or doubles. Scout's score-margin and style metrics describe HOW a fighter fights, not the rating tier their results earned.

Hemaratings recomputes in batches days-to-weeks after events. A fighter's most recent tournament may not yet be reflected.

Regional At least one of this fighter's ratings is "island" - their rank/percentile is relative to an isolated regional scene, not the global population. Cross-scene rating comparisons are unreliable.