Checking for newer data...
Newer data is available for this fighter.
Daniel Daugherty
Inactive 18m
Weapons & Rank/ratings
Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger
Current
1312
#398
Peak
1347
January 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
April 2026
Mixed & Men's Steel Single Sidesword
Regional
Current
1366
#189
Peak
1381
August 2025
Record
10W · 8L · 5D
Last
March 2026
Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier
Current
1315
#565
Peak
1329
April 2025
Record
11W · 10L · 1D
Last
April 2025
Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler
Current
1473
#215
Peak
1492
February 2025
Record
0W · 0L
Last
February 2025
Scout analysis
Rapier & Dagger
28W · 33L · 1D (45%)
Rapier & Dagger
28W · 33L · 1D (45%)
Form
Steady
Recent 45% vs older 45%
▾
Form
Steady
Recent 45% vs older 45%
Record: 28W · 33L · 1D (45%)
Recent half (31 fights): 45%
Older half (31 fights): 45%
Delta: 0%
Current streak: 2 Losses
Based on 62 recorded rapier & dagger fights.
Schedule
Punching up
-0.8 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Punching up
-0.8 vs expectation
Quality wins (won as clear underdog): 4
Upset losses (lost as clear favourite): 4
Over/under vs expectation:
-0.8
(17 actual / 17.8 expected, n=40)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Fast starter
8 exchange-coded matches
▾
Style
Fast starter
8 exchange-coded matches
Exchanges per point: 1.81
Avg exchanges / match: 7.3
Doubles / match: 0.25
First scorer rate: 75%
Dominant wins (shut-out): 17%
Comeback wins (was behind): 67%
Stage
Balanced
Pool 51% · Elim 45%
▾
Stage
Balanced
Pool 51% · Elim 45%
Pool stage: 19W · 18L (51%)
Elimination: 5W · 6L (45%)
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
▾
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Sword & Buckler
33W · 20L (62%)
Sword & Buckler
33W · 20L (62%)
Form
Steady
Recent 58% vs older 65%
▾
Form
Steady
Recent 58% vs older 65%
Record: 33W · 20L (62%)
Recent half (26 fights): 58%
Older half (26 fights): 65%
Delta: -7%
Current streak: 1 Loss
Based on 53 recorded sword & buckler fights.
Schedule
Getting ambushed
+1.1 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Getting ambushed
+1.1 vs expectation
Quality wins (won as clear underdog): 2
Upset losses (lost as clear favourite): 4
Over/under vs expectation:
+1.1
(19 actual / 17.9 expected, n=33)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
▾
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's
exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate,
comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool specialist
Pool 68% · Elim 46%
▾
Stage
Pool specialist
Pool 68% · Elim 46%
Pool stage: 23W · 11L (68%)
Elimination: 6W · 7L (46%)
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
▾
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
By division
Mixed Steel Arming Sword & Buckler
24W · 14L
(63%)
+1.5 vs expectation
(n=30)
avg opponent 1209
Mixed Steel Any One-Handed Sword & Buckler
9W · 6L
(60%)
avg opponent 1234
Sidesword
15W · 9L · 4D (54%)
Sidesword
15W · 9L · 4D (54%)
Form
Steady
Recent 57% vs older 50%
▾
Form
Steady
Recent 57% vs older 50%
Record: 15W · 9L · 4D (54%)
Recent half (14 fights): 57%
Older half (14 fights): 50%
Delta: +7%
Current streak: 2 Losses
Based on 28 recorded sidesword fights.
Schedule
Punching up
0 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Punching up
0 vs expectation
Quality wins (won as clear underdog): 1
Upset losses (lost as clear favourite): 1
Over/under vs expectation:
0
(5 actual / 5 expected, n=10)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
▾
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's
exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate,
comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool specialist
Pool 70% · Elim 33%
▾
Stage
Pool specialist
Pool 70% · Elim 33%
Pool stage: 14W · 6L (70%)
Elimination: 1W · 2L (33%)
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
▾
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
By division
Mixed Steel Single Sidesword
10W · 8L · 4D
(45%)
-1.1 vs expectation
(n=8)
avg opponent 1248
+6 fights in 1 thinner division
Rapier
11W · 10L · 1D (50%)
Rapier
11W · 10L · 1D (50%)
Form
Rising
Recent 64% vs older 36%
▾
Form
Rising
Recent 64% vs older 36%
Record: 11W · 10L · 1D (50%)
Recent half (11 fights): 64%
Older half (11 fights): 36%
Delta: +28%
Current streak: 3 Wins
Based on 22 recorded rapier fights.
Schedule
Comfort bracket
-0.3 vs expectation
▾
Schedule
Comfort bracket
-0.3 vs expectation
Over/under vs expectation:
-0.3
(4 actual / 4.3 expected, n=8)
Expectation stats compare each result with the win chance implied by both fighters' ratings in that division.
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
▾
Style
Building signal
Needs more exchange data
Style signal needs per-exchange match data. Once enough of this fighter's
exchanges are recorded, this card will sharpen into scoring tempo, doubles rate,
comeback wins, early vs late scoring, and more.
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 50%
▾
Stage
Pool data only
Pool 50%
Pool stage: 8W · 8L (50%)
Elimination: needs 3+ coded fights.
Stage tagging depends on upstream division labels - some fights may be uncategorised.
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
▾
Peak
Peak data pending
Peak volatility low
Peak is relative to an isolated regional scene - see the "How to read this profile" note below.
Reach
14 events · us · 9.4 yrs active
Single-weapon
▾
Reach
14 events · us · 9.4 yrs active
Single-weapon
Tournaments: 14
Countries fought in: 1 (us)
Months active: 113
Fights / year: 17.5
Rated weapons: 1
Clubmates
·
Metropolitan Historical Fencing Academy●
(33)
- David Rowe●
- Collin Vredenburg●
- James Darling●
- Mariana López Rodriguez●
- Joseph Yeager●
- Richard Shepro●
- Chad Reese●
- Justin Drury●
- Connor Turley●
- Jenevieve Frank●
- Beatrice Ferraiuolo●
- Julie Seeley-Hall●
- Tristan Ponader●
- Christian Gunberg●
- Esai Larios●
- Ben Samuels●
- Ava Beckman●
- Kyle Galambos●
- James Swanson●
- Morgan Conway●
- Nora Lutz●
- Brendan Morris●
- David Weydert●
- Gabriel Gallegos●
- Alistair Stohner●
- Nathaniel Larson●
- Michael Brobeck●
- Patrick Murtha●
- Brayden Chancey●
- Jack Bolger●
- Roberto Martinez●
- Kyle Thomas●
- Craig Winkels●
Events & fights
(14)
Kings Cup Series Rapier & Dagger 2026●
April 2026 · us
14 fights
▾
April 2026 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 404 ▼28 · 1,313.6
WIN
LOSS
1335 43%
WIN
Nathaniel Larson●
·
Metropolitan Historical Fencing Academy●
Rapier & Dagger
· Pools
Score 5-4
Review →
WIN
Alistair Stohner●
·
Metropolitan Historical Fencing Academy●
Rapier & Dagger
· Pools
Score 5-2
Review →
WIN
James Swanson●
·
Metropolitan Historical Fencing Academy●
Rapier & Dagger
· Pools
Score 5-2
Review →
LOSS
Ava Beckman●
·
Metropolitan Historical Fencing Academy●
Rapier & Dagger
· Top 26
Score 6-10
Review →
ARFL March Madness 2026●
March 2026 · us
6 fights
▾
March 2026 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Sidesword Rank 181 ▼12 · 1,369.0
LOSS
Zachary Lee●
·
Charlottesville HEMA●
Sidesword
· !! Attention !! Excluded From Scoring Calculations Pools
Score 0-5
Review →
LOSS
1534 33%
ARFL Messer and Sidesword 2025●
August 2025 · us
10 fights
▾
August 2025 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Sidesword Rank 158 ▲318 · 1,381.1
WIN
ARFL April Assault 2025●
April 2025 · us
8 fights
▾
April 2025 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 402 ▲228 · 1,329.0
BHL February 2025●
February 2025 · us
6 fights
▾
February 2025 · us
ARFL Winter Classic 2025●
January 2025 · us
10 fights
▾
January 2025 · us
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 236 ▲65 · 1,347.9
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Sidesword Rank 469 · 1,080.3
WIN
784 67%
30 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 155 ▲23 · 1,235.6
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 120 ▲21 · 1,409.6
16 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 174 ▲24 · 1,296.3
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 298 ▼18 · 1,241.8
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 132 ▲27 · 1,450.5
WIN
1039 59%
27 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 336 ▲90 · 1,190.8
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 197 ▲35 · 1,383.9
LOSS
865 64%
7 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 336 ▲90 · 1,190.8
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 303 ▲122 · 1,247.9
LOSS
1370 36%
8 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 229 ▲162 · 1,344.7
14 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 369 ▲55 · 1,116.7
- Mixed & Men's Steel Single Rapier Rank 313 · 1,164.7
- Mixed & Men's Steel Sword and Buckler Rank 323 · 1,205.6
5 fights
▾
Rating outcome
- Mixed & Men's Steel Rapier and Dagger Rank 288 ▲71 · 1,056.7
LOSS
991 51%
4 fights
▾
How to read this profile
Rating is Glicko-2: the number shown is score - 2*RD (97.5% confidence lower bound), not raw skill. Inactive fighters "drift down" as RD grows - not because they got worse.
Hemaratings ratings don't factor in match scores, exchange counts, or doubles. Scout's score-margin and style metrics describe HOW a fighter fights, not the rating tier their results earned.
Hemaratings recomputes in batches days-to-weeks after events. A fighter's most recent tournament may not yet be reflected.
Regional At least one of this fighter's ratings is "island" - their rank/percentile is relative to an isolated regional scene, not the global population. Cross-scene rating comparisons are unreliable.